Wednesday, 27 June 2012

Nokia 808 PureView Review - Technology and Lifestyles

Excitement, a couple of Symbian phone? The Nokia 808 PureView has forced many to reconsider their platform loyalties by virtue of its big number boast: 41-megapixels of camera goodness. The surprise stand-out of Mobile World Congress, the 808 PureView is the primary public evidence of a five year labor of affection inspired by ultra-high-resolution satellite photography. There?s compromise galore involved, however, to hitch the early PureView train, so is it worth it? Read on for the total SlashGear review.

Hardware

Miniaturization can only get you to date: if you need 41-megapixels ? and Nokia really does ? then you definitely need to accept some heft with it. Because of the the 808 PureView is a corpulent phone, measuring in at 123.9 x 60.2 x 13.9 mm and 169 grams, though it?s biased toward the lens section with its oversized sensor. Inside the hand, though, it?s actually quite a delightful thing to carry: the textured plastic back cover feels high-quality and durable, and your forefinger butts naturally against the curve of the camera hump.

That?s to not say you do not notice it when it?s to your pocket. Unlike the slimline devices we?ve grown used to, the 808 PureView makes for a substantial bulge; lets fit it right into a jeans pocket, front or back, but it surely wasn?t the main comfortable we?ve ever been.

Controls include a 3-button strip along front, for call, menu and end/power, along side a volume rocker, lock switch and dedicated two-stage camera key at the right edge. Along the highest there is a micro HDMI port (to be used with Nokia?s CA0198 HDMI kit) under a flap, a microUSB port for charging, and a three.5mm headphone socket. Nokia encompasses a wired hands-free kit of decent audio quality, though we had no issues using third-party headsets with the telephone.

Up front there is a 4-inch AMOLED ClearBlack display clad in a sheet of Corning Gorilla Glass. As with every OLED-based phones it has great viewing angles, contrast and color saturation; however, additionally it is running at a trifling 360 x 640 resolution, and that implies individual pixels are inescapable. The grittiness is visible from the outset, once the beginning-up Nokia logo appears, and permeates during the phone experience. Considering the imaging focus of this phone, it is a disappointment.

Inside, the 808 PureView packs one of many fastest processors to grace a Symbian device, a single-core ARM 11 running at 1.3GHz. It?s paired with 512MB of RAM and 16GB of storage, expandable with as much as 32GB microSD cards. Connectivity includes pentaband HSPA (as much as 14.4Mbps down/5.76Mbps up, networking depending) that means support for both AT&T and T-Mobile 3G within the USA, besides Bluetooth 3.0, WiFi b/g/n, NFC and quadband GSM/EDGE. Fit in the optional microUSB to USB Host adapter and you?ll attach peripherals like USB drives, and there is a-GPS/GPS for navigation and photo geotagging.

Software and Performance

Software is the 808 PureView?s Achilles? heel. Symbian, rebranded Nokia Belle during this latest iteration, is old within the tooth and regarded outclassed by all however the staunchest of fans. With its UI borrowing some elements of Android ? consisting of the drop-down notifications bar and the differently sized homescreen widgets ? and sharing the squircle iconography of MeeGo at the N9 it?s certainly the correct looking iteration of Symbian to-date, but day-to-day usability remains to be a pain.

What?s arguably the deal-breaker for Nokia Belle here?s the performance. At the Nokia 700, which also runs Belle on a 1.3GHz single-core, we found ourselves conceding that it could actually make an inexpensive entry-level device for the fledgling smartphone audience. Somewhere along the road, however, the 808 lost whatever turn of speed the 700 managed to squeeze from the processor.

The homescreen within reason swift, however the 808 soon runs out of steam after you get into the apps. Within the messaging app we?d sometimes have hammered out a half-word or so before the on-screen keyboard caught up; scroll fast through an entire gallery and you may see nothing but placeholder thumbnails, turning navigating images into guesswork.

It?s the browser that is the big nightmare, however, able to paper of handling full sites but battling anything more complex than their mobile versions. Pinch zooming becomes trial and blunder, tedious since given the low resolution you?ll likely be doing a large number of it. Swipe across the page and you?ve got to attend a second or two for the screen to get closer you. Flip from portrait to landscape orientation, or back again, and the lag shows itself all over again. Most disturbing though is how vulnerable to crashing it?s, the app periodically shutting down altogether. We didn?t experience an entire phone lock-up, but altogether it was enough to make us save our web browsing until we were home.

Oddly, we didn?t experience the identical sluggishness at the 808 PureView units running non-final software on our trip to Carl Zeiss several weeks ago. Then, the Nokia seemed as responsive because the 700 have been. It?s possible that the overall software tweaks have erred toward scaling back performance in favor of battery life, and if this is the case we?re hoping Nokia sees sense and tips the balance back a bit toward usability with a firmware update.

Camera

Make no mistake, the Nokia 808 PureView is all about photography. Nokia?s imaging team spent five years developing PureView ? hence it being stuck with Symbian other than getting Windows Phone just like the Lumia series ? and took the foundations of mobile cameras back to basics so one can improve on quality.

We?ve covered the technology behind PureView at the 808 comprehensively here, however the brief version is that it is a rethink of ways lossless zooming is also supported on a phone. Traditionally that might demand an optical zoom lens, involving bulky moving parts; PureView does it instead with a surfeit of pixels. In PureView mode, the 808 uses its 41-megapixel sensor to capture more typical 2-, 5- or 8-megapixel shots, and actually Nokia expects most householders to adhere at 5-megapixel quality.

Nokia 808 PureView technology:

At 1x zoom, each pixel making up the overall frame has around seven pixels at the sensor to feed into it, reducing the chance of a glitch or noise making it into the picture. PureView can simply ignore any obvious outliers, making for more accurate shots. However, on the way to zoom in, the 808 can take a full-resolution (i.e. 2-, 5- or 8-megapixel) subset of the whole frame, similar to how a digital zoom magnifies a portion but with no loss in detail.

Exactly how much you can zoom depends on what PureView resolution you?re using ? the 808 won?t allow you to get past the point where it can save a full-resolution image ? so you get more range in 2-megapixel mode than you do at 8-megapixels. It averages at roughly 3x at 5-megapixels. The phone will also allow you to shoot at ?full? resolution, either 34-megapixel 16:9 aspect images taken across the full width of the sensor, or 38-megapixel 4:3 aspect images taken across the full height of the sensor, though in that case you don?t get any zoom option.

The 808?s camera app has obviously changed from the Nokia Belle norm to accommodate PureView, and there are three key modes to choose between. Automatic strips you of all manual control bar toggling the Xenon flash between on/off/auto/red-eye modes, defaulting to roughly 5-megapixel frames, though you still get touch-focus. Scenes mode offers a choice of auto, landscape, portrait, sports, night, night portrait, spotlight and snow configurations, again with flash options and touch-focus.

Finally, there?s Creative mode, where the guts of PureView are opened up to more avid tinkerers. The 808 can be toggled between PureView mode ? with the choice of three resolutions and both 4:3 and 16:9 aspect ratios ? and Full Resolution mode ? with either 16:9 or 4:3 settings ? and save in either Normal or Superfine JPEG quality modes. Color tones can be switched between normal, vivid, sepia or black & white, and there?s optional bracketing, interval or self-timer modes. With interval, the 808 becomes a time-lapse camera, capable of shooting up to 1,500 images every 30 minutes (or as low as every 5 seconds).

Then there are sliders for saturation, contrast and sharpness, while icons on the preview screen control flash, exposure, lighting type, ISO (from 50 ? 1600, with an Auto mode) and the ability to turn off the neutral density filter. Once you have a clutch of settings you prefer, you can save them to one of the three custom shortcuts for easier retrieval.

0

Is it worth taking the time to play? Oh yes, yes it really is. We reluctantly left Carl Zeiss and our last experience with the 808 PureView wowed by quite how capable the new Nokia is, and nothing from our review unit has convinced us to think otherwise. This isn?t just ?good for a phone-camera? either; the 808 is easily able to produce shots that put dedicated point-and-shoots to shame.

Noise is almost non-existent, colors are as accurate as we?ve ever seen from a phone, and ? as long as you take the time to tap the screen to set focus ? crisp detail. Low light performance is hugely impressive, even before you bother turning on the (excellent) Xenon flash, as PureView squeezes all the extra pixel data into the final image.

In full resolution mode, meanwhile, you lack zooming ability but you get images of a scale that would traditionally demand a dedicated camera. There?s something near-magical about being able to glance across an image, think ?what?s going on there?? and zoom in without facing a screenful of pixelated mush. At 34/38-megapixel resolution there?s no PureView finessing going on ? there aren?t the extra pixels to enable it ? but it does demonstrate just how capable the sensor and companion Zeiss optics are.

As for video, the 808 PureView will record in Automatic, Scenes (auto, low light, sports, spotlight and snow) or Creative modes, at 360p, 720p or 1080p resolution. A choice of 15, 24, 25 and 30fps frame rates are supported, plus the same color tone options as in stills mode, together with exposure and contrast. Since even 1920 x 1080 Full HD resolution doesn?t come close to what the 808?s sensor is capable of capturing, the same PureView oversampling is used to improve video quality, and just as with stills the evidence of that comes through inside the final frame.

Nokia 808 PureView 1080p HD video sample:

Our only complaint is the somewhat sluggish continuous autofocus, which has a tendency to wander and is occasionally slow to refix. You can, however, tap to manually set a focus point. While your fingers are near the screen, it?s worth playing with Nokia?s clever zoom control: you may pinch-zoom, of course, but we found it easier to use the single-finger zooming where sliding your thumb up and down adjusts the degree of magnification. It?s easy to keep both hands steadying the 808 and still zoom in, and when you?re zooming during video capture the actual magnification doesn?t happen until you lift your finger, allowing you to precisely frame without the hunting of regular systems. Alternatively you can use the zoom rocker, and unlike the stepped zoom levels of some devices, it?s a silky-smooth transition.

Nokia 808 PureView 1080p HD video sample:

Audio during video recording is often overlooked, but Nokia has saved a little magic for that, too. The PureView has twin microphones for capturing stereo sound, but it also includes Rich Recording, a way to capture high-volume audio without suffering from distortion or clipping. In fact, Nokia claims the 808 is capable of handling four-times louder sound than regular phone microphones, without having to introduce the sort of filters that can leave the audio track weedy.

Going by Nokia?s spec sheet, the 808 PureView should be able to capture the sound of a jet engine from 100-feet away without any stereo distortion. Topping out at 145dB, in fact, it?s beyond the purpose where human ears would likely suffer permanent damage even if they?re equipped with hearing protection. An average rock concert, meanwhile, at a more humble 115dB should be no problem at all for the 808 PureView, though we?ll need to schedule one on our jam-packed social calendar to actually test that out.

1

Getting photos and video off the 808 is reasonably straightforward. The phone can be set to show up as a Mass Storage device when plugged in via USB, appearing on your PC or Mac as an external drive (rather than demanding a management app as per Windows Phone). However we were surprised to find transfers very sluggish to our test Mac: shuttling just over 440MB of photos and video took around five minutes, in fact. There?s no native option to automatically upload images to an online gallery.

There are more 808 PureView camera samples here

The Future of PureView

Nokia has already confirmed that PureView technology won?t be limited to just the 808. However, that?s already prompted confusion around just what sort of resolution sensors we can expect in future Lumia Windows Phones. PureView does not necessarily mean 41-megapixels ? Nokia picked that number to satisfy headlines and deliver a 3x optical zoom equivalent for 5-megapixel frames ? but instead refers to the oversampling technology; a lower-resolution sensor would still deliver a lossless zoom, albeit with a smaller range, while allowing for a thinner device.

2

Phone and Battery

Nokia has a strong track record with phone radios, and the 808 PureView is no exception. We had no issues with keeping a signal, and the dual-microphones meant in-call audio was clear. The 808?s 1,400 mAh battery is rated for up to 6.5hrs of 3G talk time or 540hrs of 3G standby, though the actual sort of longevity you?ll see from it is very much dependent on how much you play with the camera. The Xenon flash in particular will chug through battery in short order. In practice, we managed a day of relatively eager use before we had to reach for the mains adapter.

3

Wrap-Up

Viewed as a modern phone, the 808 PureView is a recipe for frustration. It?s heavy and chunky, the screen lacks pixels, Nokia Belle is short on apps and long on aggravation, and even those apps that are onboard run with varying degrees of wretchedness on the wheezing processor. When the 808 starts to make more sense is when you flip it around, and consider it not so much a phone with an amazing camera, but an amazing camera with a 3G internet connection.

With such mundane matters as messaging, internet browsing, multimedia and apps left to a more flexible (but less photographically-capable) platform like iOS or Android, that frees up the 808 PureView to do what it undoubtedly does best: take awesome photos and video. If you can find space in your pocket or bag for two phones, and you?re a keen shutterbug, then there are huge advantages to using the 808 rather than your regular phone camera.

4

Therein lies the rub: at $699 unlocked and SIM-free in the US, it?s an expensive second device. That would get you a good Micro Four Thirds camera, though blind testing suggests the 808 can produce photos as good as, or better than, such compacts. It would also be enough for an entry-level DSLR, though you?d lose any semblance of pocket-friendliness in that case.

In the end, though, even the fact that we?re comparing the 808 PureView to DSLRs is testament to Nokia?s achievement. Few people will actually go out and buy it themselves, but then the 808 is really a test bench for PureView technology, a proof-of-concept. Now that it has convinced us of its merits, Nokia can leverage the branding to differentiate its Windows Phone range. Frankly, the sooner it would try this, the easier.

Check out the original source here.

new years eve ball drop new years eve times square 2012 2012 holidays prosperity japan earthquake bosom buddies diplo

No comments:

Post a Comment